The push for stronger political representation for women has long been expected in Indian democracy. The Women’s Reservation Act was passed by Parliament, yet its implementation has been delayed due to the census and delimitation conditions. A fresh debate was triggered on November 11 when the Supreme Court questioned why this law cannot be implemented immediately.
The question was raised during the hearing of a petition filed by Dr. Jaya Thakur from the Congress women’s wing. The Court asked why 33% representation for women cannot be provided in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies without waiting for new delimitation. Though a similar plea was dismissed earlier in 2023, the Court has now issued notice to the Centre and sought a detailed response.
The petitioner argued that Article 334A creates an unnecessary delay and violates constitutional equality. She said other amendments, such as EWS and the 73rd and 74th Amendments, were implemented without waiting for the census. According to her, denying immediate quota blocks women’s political rights.
Justice BV Nagarathna suggested that political parties should start giving more tickets to women even before the law is implemented. The bench indicated that temporary measures are possible until delimitation is completed. Though the government’s intent appears uncertain, the Court’s observations may guide future action and support women’s entry into politics.
